Harry White Word Count 2082
How is the thriller genre represented in Sam Mendez ‘Skyfall’
(2012) and Kathryn Bigelow’s ‘The Hurt locker’ (2008)?
‘Skyfall’ (Mendez: 2012) and
‘The Hurt Locker’ (Bigelow: 2008) both interpret the thriller genre in similar
ways and different, in both films the element of thriller is used to raise the
suspense of the scene and is associated with stealth which both of these films
are mainly about as in Skyfall James Bond is a spy and in The Hurt Locker
William James is a soldier who have to be stealthy and practical for when they
are doing tense tasks such as a raid on a compound, both the directors are
trying to give the viewer a chance to see what it is like to be in the shoes of
the protagonist and draw them to what is happening on the screen. The macro
element I will be looking at is genre, which in some ways can be linked with
representation.
The first film I will be
analyzing is ‘Skyfall’ (Mendez: 2012) and is a action thriller set in multiple
locations but the two most used locations are London and shanghai, the film is
about a British spy who goes by the name James bond who has to prevent the
antagonist Silva from seeking revenge on Bonds employer ‘M’ Daniel Craig is the
man who plays Bond and Judi Dench as ‘M’. The film explores the feeling of
trust, and also the more emotional side of being a covert agent. The film uses
the micro element well to give the impression that it is a thriller,
mise-en-scene especially as lighting plays a role in setting the atmosphere as
in the scene which I reviewed, which is the shanghai chase scene where bond has
to follow his contract to find more about what is going to happen and where the
stolen hard-drive had been taken to and for what use, the lighting in the scene
is gloomy and dark which makes the atmosphere more tense and thrilling, and
injects the sense of mystery, and with the lighting being dark it creates a
sense of fear as most people are afraid of the dark and what the shadows do
hold. Another key element is the sound of the scene which is a drone that gets
tense as bond gets closer to the target and is at its prime when Bond has to
cling onto the elevator without the pursued seeing him hanging onto the bottom
of the elevator, the sound is non-diegetic and it makes the viewer wonder what
is going to happen in the next scene. There is a high angle shot in this scene
when he is climbing up the elevator shaft where the camera is looking down on
bond, this is in place because you get to see how high up Bond is and the drop
which is right below him making the audience feel on edge and adding fear into
them, because the fear of heights is a common fear in society so this is
targeting the majority of the target audience causing them to feel un easy and
thus adding to the immersion of the film. When Bond gets to the top he
continues the chase the antagonist into a room with the music still going
increasing in volume so adding to the suspense of the scene, however the
editing of the music is well done because when bond is in the light from the
advertising board which is on the building the music increases in volume and
then decreases when he isn’t, this gives a feeling that this is risky business
and at any one time he could get caught. This contrasts with the scene I am doing
from the hurt locker because; one it is during the day and that is when the
viewer is least likely to expect a tense scene, but you could argue that the
building that the squad enters is dark in some places (where the enemies could
be hiding) it also contrasts with the music because in some parts there is no
music which is a convention of the thriller genre, there is usually no music
when the main character is really close to being found out, or when the
protagonist has to be really careful that he has to be focused incase they get
ambushed, and it is also used in horror films before a jump scare scene, it is
used so the audience are caught off guard as they are concentration on
listening to the diegetic sound of the scene and then that is the point when the
jump scare gets you. Although horror films are not thrillers they are closely
related to each other as in there are sometimes jump scares in thriller genre
so they use the same techniques as they do in horror films, making the scene
absent of music so you feel as thought there is going to be a jump scare, but
there often isn’t in thriller genre, leading to a false sense of in security.
Skyfall however does follow
some conventions of a thriller, which is probably why it is categorized into
the thriller genre the main reason being is thrillers a mostly tense and have a
lot of stealth as the protagonist pursues the villain while avoiding detection.
Weather that will be a spy working for mi5 or a squad of troops trespassing into
a know hostile command post. Another
convention of a thriller is the eeriness of the scene which is well done in
Skyfall as to get the eerie feel to the scenario there has to be no other
people around other than the protagonists and antagonist so the room is quiet
and the only thing you can hear is the feint asynchronous sound of doors
opening and closing. Another thing, which is applied in Skyfall and The Hurt
Locker, is Todorov’s theory of equilibrium, where there is a state of
equilibrium at the outset, when bond is following the criminal, and then there
is the disruption of the equilibrium where bond gets discovered and they have a
fight. to reinstate the equilibrium bond kills the criminal.
The second film I will be
analyzing is ‘The Hurt Locker’ (Bigelow: 2008) which is again an action
thriller set in Afghanistan and is about a man who is a hut locker (which is a
person who risks their live to defuse bombs which could explode at ay time) He
enjoys the danger of it, the main focus of the storyline is about combating
terrorism while trying to find his inner self so he can return home to his wife
and family. The scene that I will be looking at is the raid scene where the
soldiers have been called into a suspected terrorist compound, this gives the
film the thriller aspect of the film, as they have to go into it and search for
the terrorists. The mise-en-scene is the big one here because right from the
start it sets the mood as the compound is dark which makes it seem worse while
having some light areas to show it is still day time, also there are some props
in the compound that make it relevant as the kettle is still warm so it
indicates that someone is still there thus adding to the thriller aspect that
there is someone there but you don’t know where they are. The acting in the scene
is vital to make the scene believable, as the soldiers have to look scared and
cautious as well as maintaining their professional attitude to what they do.
For this to work the cinematography of the scene has to be mainly close ups as
the soldiers hardly ever look away from their rifles in case something bad
happens. To give the scene the feeling that they are all vulnerable to an
attack the camera stays in one spot and does a full 360-degree pan so the
audience can see how open the space is. This is in contrast to Skyfall as there
is no 360 degree pan in that scene mainly because there is only one person, but
also because throughout that scene we know where the antagonist is at all
times, but the enemies in the hurt locker are hid away from the soldiers to
ambush them. Also in the Hurt Locker scene the camera is on a stedi-cam to give
the impression that they are always on the move and to add fear to the scene.
The sound in the scene adds more tension as there Is not dialogue or diegetic
sounds or non-diegetic sounds, the only sounds you can hear are synchronous and
asynchronous footsteps which makes it even more tense as you have to focus in
on the scene to fully understand, the climax of the scene is when one of the
soldiers accidently stands on a glass bottle and they all stand still and the
camera stops with them to make the audience feel as though they are in the
squad, the silence is finally broken when they find out that the building is
clear and the soldiers posture changes from stiff to free moving and they begin
to talk and that is when you know that the thriller scene is over and the
suspense dies down. The editing involves a lot of eye line matches as the
soldiers have to see what hand signals they are coordinating so there is also a
lot of shot reverse shots as well so the audience can see the reactions of the
soldiers and the emotions via the extreme close up of their faces. The
mise-en-scene has another part with the costume which the soldiers are wearing,
which is all in uniform, showing that they are a unit, and that they are being
serious, they also have matching guns again to show that they are all equal and
part of a team, this makes the scene have a little less of the thriller style
as there is more than one person entering the compound, whereas in Skyfall
there is only one person pursuing the antagonist, however in Skyfall you know
who the antagonist is but in The Hurt Locker you don’t know who or where the
antagonistic characters are. Contrast to The Hurt Locker, in Skyfall the
protagonist is wearing undercover clothes so he doesn’t get found out, and the
fact that he is on his own and the soldiers are not makes the scene in Skyfall
look tenser in contrast to the scene in the Hurt Locker. There is also some use
of Todorov’s theory of equilibrium in The Hurt Locker as well As before they go
into the compound there is a state of equilibrium and then when hey enter the
compound the state of equilibrium is disrupted so they go to sort it out and
when they realize that no one is there then the equilibrium is restored and the
tenseness of the scene dies down.
The two films both have the
thriller aspect in them with the way they follow the conventions of the genre
but execute them slightly differently mainly by the way in which the films are
represented, for example the protagonists in both of the films have different
backdrops, James Bond is a spy who was raised by the mi5 from when he was young
and his method of approach is to sneak around and stalk his enemies, where as
the soldiers chose to be soldiers and follow orders to the letter of the order,
the soldiers are more direct with their approach as they go in with their
uniform and their weapons out, and the soldiers have a pack mentality as they
travel in squads so they feel safer taking some of the thriller aspect out of
the scenes, where as Bond has a more indirect approach as he has the freedom to
dress how he wants and have a concealed weapon, and Bond works on his own so
the scene feels more tense because he has no-one to back him up, however you
always know where the antagonist is in Skyfall, but in The Hurt Locker the
enemies can be anywhere adding fear to the scene. Both of the films also show
great examples of Todorov’s theory of equilibrium as that is the theory which
goes hand in hand with the thriller genre as I have proven with the two scenes
in the films which I studied
No comments:
Post a Comment